Human review

Free Canadian small business workbook

Human-in-the-Loop Review Map

A worksheet for defining where people approve, edit, reject, escalate, or audit AI outputs.

7 pages · PDF workbook · No email required

Actual working-record worksheet from the Human-in-the-Loop Review Map, page 3 of 7.
Preview all 7 pages Read the complete workbook before downloading.
Preview the complete PDF All 7 pages · Free to explore

Scroll through the full workbook below. Download the PDF for selectable text, printing and your own working copy.

Workbook page 1 of 7. For selectable text, use the free PDF download.
Page 1 of 7
Workbook page 2 of 7. For selectable text, use the free PDF download.
Page 2 of 7
Workbook page 3 of 7. For selectable text, use the free PDF download.
Page 3 of 7
Workbook page 4 of 7. For selectable text, use the free PDF download.
Page 4 of 7
Workbook page 5 of 7. For selectable text, use the free PDF download.
Page 5 of 7
Workbook page 6 of 7. For selectable text, use the free PDF download.
Page 6 of 7
Workbook page 7 of 7. For selectable text, use the free PDF download.
Page 7 of 7

What’s inside

A working guide
for a real decision.

Design the human role around judgment, accountability, exception handling, and quality improvement instead of vague oversight. Use this guide to make the operating choice explicit, test it with evidence, and record who owns the next decision.

Who this is for

Teams turning architecture work into a reusable operating artifact.

Bring the people who own the work

Include the workflow owner, a person who performs the work, a reviewer with authority to approve or stop it, and the relevant data or tool owner.

Includes an explainer, working worksheet, three illustrative examples and practical considerations. This is a planning PDF, not prebuilt automation software.

Use it with your own work

Five questions
to work through.

Choose one workflow. Record enough context to support a decision, then use the worksheet to name the owner, evidence and next review.

  1. Approve

    Which outputs can move forward after review?

  2. Edit

    When should a reviewer improve the output rather than reject it?

  3. Reject

    Which defects require the output to be stopped?

  4. Escalate

    Which topics, customers, or decisions require a higher-authority reviewer?

  5. Audit

    Which outputs should be sampled later for quality and pattern detection?

Illustrative examples from the workbook

Where this becomes practical.

Consulting Practice

Review an AI-drafted proposal

An apparently polished proposal includes scope language the consultant has not approved.

Independent Retailer

Review customer commitments

Routine answers can be fast, but refunds or allergy questions need a staff checkpoint.

Accounting Practice

Review a client-facing summary

A source-linked draft still needs a professional to confirm figures and interpretation.

AI-supported role
Prepare a review packet with sources, uncertainties, exceptions, and the proposed next action.
Human authority
The designated reviewer approves, edits, rejects, escalates, or samples outputs based on risk.
What to measure
Track review time, rejection reasons, missed escalations, and corrections after approval.

Illustrative scenarios, not client results or a promise of performance. The workbook includes additional case-specific prompts.

A useful first step

Use the workbook.
Bring us the next question.

Download and use it without booking a call. If you want help applying it, email Chris with the workflow you’re considering and what you want to improve.

Discuss your workflow

Further reading in the library

General operational guidance only. These resources are not legal, privacy, cybersecurity or regulatory advice.